Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1333174

Re: {SPAM?} Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... => x86/events/core.c

From Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: {SPAM?} Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... => x86/events/core.c
Date 2016-02-12 23:20 +0100
Message-ID <r1ued-4Bn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qZWHE-7Fq-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0fqY-3Sj-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0gZI-4N6-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0h9o-56j-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> see for example how Git still knows that we had a 
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c initial file name.
> 
> Or how you did an optimization in c48b60538c3ba when the file was already named 
> cpu/perf_event.c! :-)

yes, for simple renames it works, but once files start getting 
"reorganized" and split up it gets tricky.  For example trying to track 
things across the single perf_event.h to the separate perf_event.h files
after the UAPI split is always a pain.

But anyway, it sounds like the renames are being done for reasonably good 
reasons, it's just the tip commit message that came my way didn't have 
this extra context.

Thanks,

Vince

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... =>   x86/events/core.c tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-02-09 13:20 +0100
  Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... =>   x86/events/core.c Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> - 2016-02-09 15:00 +0100
    Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... =>  x86/events/core.c Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-09 15:10 +0100
      Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... =>  x86/events/core.c Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-02-09 15:20 +0100
      Re: {SPAM?} Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c  ............... => x86/events/core.c Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> - 2016-02-12 23:20 +0100
    Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... =>  x86/events/core.c Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-09 15:10 +0100

csiph-web