Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1332602
| From | Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@pmhahn.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg |
| Date | 2016-02-12 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r1i3o-4XY-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <r11OW-2po-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r12UG-3l3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r13xn-3yp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r14jL-48t-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r15fP-4NX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Rainer,
Am 11.02.2016 um 20:37 schrieb Rainer Weikusat:
> The unix_dgram_sendmsg routine use the following test
>
> if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
>
> to determine if sk and other are in an n:1 association (either
> established via connect or by using sendto to send messages to an
> unrelated socket identified by address). This isn't correct as the
> specified address could have been bound to the sending socket itself or
> because this socket could have been connected to itself by the time of
> the unix_peer_get but disconnected before the unix_state_lock(other). In
> both cases, the if-block would be entered despite other == sk which
> might either block the sender unintentionally or lead to trying to unlock
> the same spin lock twice for a non-blocking send. Add a other != sk
> check to guard against this.
>
> Fixes: 7d267278a9ec ("unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue")
> Reported-By: Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@pmhahn.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 29be035..f1ca279 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -1781,7 +1781,12 @@ restart_locked:
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
> + /* other == sk && unix_peer(other) != sk if
> + * - unix_peer(sk) == NULL, destination address bound to sk
> + * - unix_peer(sk) == sk by time of get but disconnected before lock
> + */
> + if (other != sk &&
> + unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
> if (timeo) {
> timeo = unix_wait_for_peer(other, timeo);
>
>
After applying that patch at least my machine running the samba test no
longer crashes. So you might add
Tested-by: Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@pmhahn.de>
Thanks for looking it that issues.
Philipp
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Bug 4.1.16: self-detected stall in net/unix/? Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@pmhahn.de> - 2016-02-11 14:50 +0100
Re: Bug 4.1.16: self-detected stall in net/unix/? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-11 17:00 +0100
Re: Bug 4.1.16: self-detected stall in net/unix/? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-11 18:10 +0100
Re: Bug 4.1.16: self-detected stall in net/unix/? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-11 18:50 +0100
Re: Bug 4.1.16: self-detected stall in net/unix/? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-11 19:00 +0100
Re: Bug 4.1.16: self-detected stall in net/unix/? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-11 19:40 +0100
[PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-11 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@pmhahn.de> - 2016-02-12 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-12 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-12 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-12 21:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-12 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2016-02-12 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-02-16 19:00 +0100
csiph-web