Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1332404

[PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust

From Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust
Date 2016-02-11 23:20 +0100
Message-ID <r17KG-6xV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Switching between stacks is only valid if we are tracing ourselves while on the
irq_stack, so it is only valid when in current and non-preemptible context,
otherwise is is just zeroed off.

Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 13 ++++++-------
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c      | 11 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 12a18cb..d9751a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -44,14 +44,13 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
 	unsigned long irq_stack_ptr;
 
 	/*
-	 * Use raw_smp_processor_id() to avoid false-positives from
-	 * CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT. get_wchan() calls unwind_frame() on sleeping
-	 * task stacks, we can be pre-empted in this case, so
-	 * {raw_,}smp_processor_id() may give us the wrong value. Sleeping
-	 * tasks can't ever be on an interrupt stack, so regardless of cpu,
-	 * the checks will always fail.
+	 * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in
+	 * non-preemptible context.
 	 */
-	irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(raw_smp_processor_id());
+	if (tsk == current && !preemptible())
+		irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
+	else
+		irq_stack_ptr = 0;
 
 	low  = frame->sp;
 	/* irq stacks are not THREAD_SIZE aligned */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index cbedd72..7d8db3a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -146,9 +146,18 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct stackframe frame;
-	unsigned long irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
+	unsigned long irq_stack_ptr;
 	int skip;
 
+	/*
+	 * Switching between  stacks is valid when tracing current and in
+	 * non-preemptible context.
+	 */
+	if (tsk == current && !preemptible())
+		irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
+	else
+		irq_stack_ptr = 0;
+
 	pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
 
 	if (!tsk)
-- 
2.0.2

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-02-11 23:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - 2016-02-12 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-02-12 18:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-12 18:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-02-12 18:50 +0100
          Reinitiazling an arm machine without restarting the kernel or  rebooting the machine Rudici Cazeao <rudici.cazeao@litepoint.com> - 2016-02-12 19:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-02-12 19:00 +0100

csiph-web