Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1332361

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems

From Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems
Date 2016-02-11 22:00 +0100
Message-ID <r16vg-5ys-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <r0L7s-8cT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0LK9-8u9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0Z0K-uI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r11lU-2aN-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r16lA-5v2-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
[..]
>> It seems to me we need to modify the
>> metadata i/o paths to bypass the page cache,
>
> XFS doesn't use the block device page cache for it's metadata - it
> has it's own internal metadata cache structures and uses get_pages
> or heap memory to back it's metadata. But that doesn't make mixing
> DAX and pages in the block device mapping tree sane.
>
> What you are missing here is that the underlying architecture of
> journalling filesystems mean they can't use DAX for their metadata.
> Modifications have to be buffered, because they have to be written
> to the journal first before they are written back in place. IOWs, we
> need to buffer changes in volatile memory for some time, and that
> means we can't use DAX during transactional modifications.
>
> And to put the final nail in that coffin, metadata in XFS can be
> discontiguous multi-block objects - in those situations we vmap the
> underlying pages so they appear to the code to be a contiguous
> buffer, and that's something we can't do with DAX....

Sorry, I wasn't clear when I said "bypass page cache" I meant a
solution similar to commit d1a5f2b4d8a1 "block: use DAX for partition
table reads".  However, I suspect that is broken if the filesystem is
not ready to see a new page allocated for every I/O.  I assume one
thread will want to insert a page in the radix for another thread to
find/manipulate before metadata gets written back to storage.

>> or teach the fsync code
>> how to flush populated data pages out of the radix.
>
> That doesn't solve the problem. Filesystems free and reallocate
> filesystem blocks without intermediate block device mapping
> invalidation calls, so what is one minute a data block accessed by
> DAX may become a metadata block that accessed via buffered IO.  It
> all goes to crap very quickly....
>
> However, I'd say fsync is not the place to address this. This block
> device cache aliasing issue is supposed to be what
> unmap_underlying_metadata() solves, right?

I'll take a look at this.  Right now I'm trying to implement the
"clear block-device-inode S_DAX on fs mount" approach.  My concern
though is that  we need to disable block device mmap while a
filesystem is mounted...

Maybe I don't need to worry because it's already the case that a mmap
of the raw device may not see the most up to date data for a file that
has dirty fs-page-cache data.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-10 21:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-02-10 23:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-10 23:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-02-11 00:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-02-11 14:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-02-11 16:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-02-11 17:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-02-11 21:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-02-11 22:00 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-02-11 23:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-02-12 00:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-02-12 00:50 +0100

csiph-web