Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1332337
| From | Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting |
| Date | 2016-02-11 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r15pw-4RP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <r0Hnc-5O7-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0KuK-7H1-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0NiW-16K-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0ZWP-17m-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <r14a7-44q-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/11/2016 10:20 AM, Tim Chen wrote: > The brk1 test is also somewhat pathologic. It > does nothing but brk which is unlikely for real workload. > So we have to be careful when we are tuning our system > behavior for brk1 throughput. We'll need to make sure > whatever changes we made don't impact other more useful > workloads adversely. Yeah, there are *so* many alternatives to using brk() or mmap()/munmap() frequently. glibc has tunables to tune how tightly coupled malloc()/free() are with virtual space allocation. Raising those can reduce the brk() frequency. There are also other allocators that take much larger chunks of virtual address space and then "free" memory with MADV_FREE instead of brk(). I think jemalloc does this, for instance.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-10 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 18:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-11 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-11 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-10 19:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-10 22:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-11 01:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-11 15:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-11 19:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2016-02-11 20:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-11 22:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-11 22:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-12 13:30 +0100
csiph-web