Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.

From	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date	2016-02-11 16:00 +0100
Message-ID	<r10SS-1KU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qXGdY-13U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXGdZ-13U-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
<gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> numa-node-id and device node distance-map.

How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.

Do you have a git tree with this series?

Rob

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation. Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2016-02-11 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation. Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 17:00 +0100

csiph-web