Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK

From	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK
Date	2016-02-10 10:30 +0100
Message-ID	<r0zfY-kZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qU8sa-4Hl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVz6X-4J4-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVMnx-6eG-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus
>
> 2016-01-27 23:11 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Masahiro Yamada
>> <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
>>
>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK is more suitable than CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK
>>> to guard the drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/ directory.
>>> (I renamed CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON to CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK.)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
>>
>> This patch does not apply to linux v4.5-rc1, please rebase the
>> patch and resend.
>
>
> These two patches can be applied in this order:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097541/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097551/
>
> (Sorry, I should have sent them as a series.)

No order works for me and I have merged quite a lot of other stuff
that had higher priority.

But please rebase both patches on my "devel" branch and resend
and I will apply them.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-02-10 10:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-02-10 11:00 +0100

csiph-web