Re: [PATCH] Optimize int_sqrt for small values for faster idle

From	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] Optimize int_sqrt for small values for faster idle
Date	2016-02-09 21:50 +0100
Message-ID	<r0nov-QC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qW2BY-13z-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXucO-qs-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXumu-vl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZFdM-3BZ-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:32:26PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01 2016, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:25:17PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 28 2016, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> >> >
> >> > The menu cpuidle governor does at least two int_sqrt() each time
> >> > we go into idle in get_typical_interval to compute stddev
> >> >
> >> > int_sqrts take 100-120 cycles each. Short idle latency is important
> >> > for many workloads.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> If you want to optimize get_typical_interval(), why not just take the
> >> square root out of the equation (literally)?
> >> 
> >> Something like
> >
> > Looks good. Yes that's a better fix.
> >
> 
> Andi, did you have a way to measure the impact, and if so, could I get
> you to run the numbers again with my patch?

I got the numbers from the 0day runs (AIM7 gets faster)
In theory if you post the patch that should happen automatically
(checking with Fengguang)

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] Optimize int_sqrt for small values for faster idle Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-09 21:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Optimize int_sqrt for small values for faster idle Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2016-02-10 14:40 +0100

csiph-web