Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1330312
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c |
| Date | 2016-02-09 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r0i5s-5IR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qZWHD-7Fq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZWHF-7Fq-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0h9n-56j-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09/02/2016 15:05, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-02-08 17:15+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> Do for kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer and kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs
>> what the other irq.c routines have been doing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,10 @@
>> */
>> int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> - return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> + if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
>> + return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> +
>> + return true;
>
> Apart from int/bool mismatch, it returned 0 before and that was correct.
>
So that means "return 0;" implies "Reviewed-by"? :)
Paolo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-02-08 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-02-09 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-02-09 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-02-09 16:30 +0100
csiph-web