Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1330312

Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c

From Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c
Date 2016-02-09 16:10 +0100
Message-ID <r0i5s-5IR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qZWHD-7Fq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZWHF-7Fq-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0h9n-56j-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 09/02/2016 15:05, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-02-08 17:15+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> Do for kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer and kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs
>> what the other irq.c routines have been doing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,10 @@
>>   */
>>  int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>> -	return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> +	if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
>> +		return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> +
>> +	return true;
> 
> Apart from int/bool mismatch, it returned 0 before and that was correct.
> 

So that means "return 0;" implies "Reviewed-by"? :)

Paolo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-02-08 17:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-02-09 15:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-02-09 16:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-02-09 16:30 +0100

csiph-web