Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1330083
| From | David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64 |
| Date | 2016-02-09 12:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r0ebw-2Tw-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r00rT-1Mq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: George Spelvin [mailto:linux@horizon.com] > Sent: 08 February 2016 20:13 > David Laight wrote: > > I'd need convincing that unrolling the loop like that gives any significant gain. > > You have a dependency chain on the carry flag so have delays between the 'adcq' > > instructions (these may be more significant than the memory reads from l1 cache). > > If the carry chain is a bottleneck, on Broadwell+ (feature flag > X86_FEATURE_ADX), there are the ADCX and ADOX instructions, which use > separate flag bits for their carry chains and so can be interleaved. > > I don't have such a machine to test on, but if someone who does > would like to do a little benchmarking, that would be an interesting > data point. > > Unfortunately, that means yet another version of the main loop, > but if there's a significant benefit... Well, the only part actually worth writing in assembler is the 'adc' loop. So run-time substitution of separate versions (as is done for memcpy()) wouldn't be hard. Since adcx and adox must execute in parallel I clearly need to re-remember how dependencies against the flags register work. I'm sure I remember issues with 'false dependencies' against the flags. However you still need a loop construct that doesn't modify 'o' or 'c'. Using leal, jcxz, jmp might work. (Unless broadwell actually has a fast 'loop' instruction.) (I've not got a suitable test cpu.) David
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64 "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com> - 2016-02-08 21:20 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64 David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-02-09 12:00 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64 "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com> - 2016-02-10 02:00 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64 David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-02-10 12:50 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64 "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com> - 2016-02-10 15:50 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64 David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-02-10 16:30 +0100
csiph-web