Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1331653

Re: fs/udf and udftools

From Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: fs/udf and udftools
Date 2016-02-11 03:20 +0100
Message-ID <r0P1n-2gt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r0L7r-8cT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0OI2-1Ue-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:56:16PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> [add Jan Kara]
> 
> On 02/10/16 13:29, Steve Kenton wrote:
> > Is anyone maintaining these or am I about to volunteer for another job?
> 
> CUrrent MAINTAINERS file says:
> 
> UDF FILESYSTEM
> M:	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> S:	Maintained
> F:	Documentation/filesystems/udf.txt
> F:	fs/udf/
> 
> and that Doc. file says:
> 
> For the latest version and toolset see:
> 	http://linux-udf.sourceforge.net/
> 
A bit of googling for udftools suggests that gentoo are maintaining
their build, debian have patches for gcc-4 and gcc-5 among others,
Fedora have their own patches, and Arch have some patches (which
might be the same as some of hte others, I did not look).

Looks like the normal "possibly abandonned, but still useful to some
people" software, where distros keep it building.

There may also be others.

Links -

https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/udftools/ChangeLog?view=markup

https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/udftools/+changelog

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/udftools.git/tree/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udftools/

> 
> > I'm having to dig into fs/udf and udftools/mkudffs as part of a project I'm working on.
> > It looks like both have been lacking in personal TLC for quite a while. The changes to
> > fs/udf seem to be tree wide VFS work but not updates to things like write support and
> > udftools seems to have been frozen for >10  years. Both ~work but I'd like to fix an
> > oops I'm getting in udftools and work on adding fallocate() support to fs/udf and then
> > feed it back to the community rather than let the changes bit rot locally.
> > 
> > Where to go from here? I've been reading LKML on marc: for years, mainly to see what Linus,
> > Al and a variable group of other people say/do but I've never done more than tinker with
> > the kernel locally. I'm using git for the project mentioned above but again am not an
> > expert but willing to learn. I'm not currently subscribed so please cc me if you could.
> > 
> > smk
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~Randy

-- 
This email was written using 100% recycled letters.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

fs/udf and udftools Steve Kenton <skenton@ou.edu> - 2016-02-10 23:10 +0100
  Re: fs/udf and udftools Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> - 2016-02-11 03:00 +0100
    Re: fs/udf and udftools Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com> - 2016-02-11 03:20 +0100
      Re: fs/udf and udftools Steve Kenton <skenton@ou.edu> - 2016-02-11 04:50 +0100
        Re: fs/udf and udftools Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-02-11 11:10 +0100
          Re: fs/udf and udftools Steve Kenton <skenton@ou.edu> - 2016-02-11 16:40 +0100

csiph-web