Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1331270
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE |
| Date | 2016-02-10 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r0ESm-3Vo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r0i5s-5IR-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0ioQ-5QL-85@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0sRc-4oH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday 09 February 2016 18:37:46 Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 02/09/2016 07:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 February 2016 07:08:59 Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> IS_ERR_VALUE() assumes that its parameter is an unsigned long. > >> It can not be used to check if an unsigned int reflects an error. > >> Doing so can result in the following build warning. > >> > >> drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c: In function ‘digicolor_uart_probe’: > >> include/linux/err.h:21:38: warning: > >> comparison is always false due to limited range of data type > >> drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c:485:6: note: > >> in expansion of macro ‘IS_ERR_VALUE’ > >> > >> If that warning is seen, an error return from platform_get_irq() is missed. > >> > >> > > > > The patch looks correct to me, but what compiler version and which kernel > > tree is it that triggered the warning? > > > > Andrzej Hajda just modified the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE(), and the > > changes are still under discussion, but I don't see that warning with > > any of the versions. > > > I see it with gcc 5.1 and 5.2 (and W=1). I did not see / notice Andrzej's patch. > > I agree that fixing the problem in IS_ERR_VALUE() is preferrable. > > Ah, W=1 explains it. We are still debating about the proper solution. Al Viro pointed out that most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() shouldn't be using it at all, so your patch is probably best here after all. Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-02-09 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-09 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-02-10 03:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-10 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-02-11 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-11 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-02-11 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-12 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-02-11 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-02-11 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> - 2016-02-11 08:00 +0100
csiph-web