Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1329557

Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: workingset: make shadow node shrinker memcg aware

From Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: workingset: make shadow node shrinker memcg aware
Date 2016-02-08 21:50 +0100
Message-ID <r00UW-1XR-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qZBjQ-Sz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZBjR-Sz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZNuF-1eE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZUZc-6vM-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:28:35PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:23:53AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > It's true that both the shrinking of the active list and subsequent
> > activations to regrow it will reduce the number of actionable
> > refaults, and so it wouldn't be unreasonable to also shrink shadow
> > nodes when the active list shrinks.
> > 
> > However, I think these are too many assumptions to encode in the
> > shrinker, because it is only meant to prevent a worst-case explosion
> > of radix tree nodes. I'd prefer it to be dumb and conservative.
> > 
> > Could we instead go with the current usage of the memcg? Whether
> > reclaim happens globally or due to the memory limit, the usage at the
> > time of reclaim gives a good idea of the memory is available to the
> > group. But it's making less assumptions about the internal composition
> > of the memcg's memory, and the consequences associated with that.
> 
> But that would likely result in wasting a considerable chunk of memory
> for stale shadow nodes in case file caches constitute only a small part
> of memcg memory consumption, which isn't good IMHO.

Hm, that's probably true. But I think it's a separate patch at this
point - going from total memory to the cache portion for overhead
reasons - that shouldn't be conflated with the memcg awareness patch.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/5] mm: workingset: make shadow node shrinker memcg aware Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
  [PATCH 1/5] mm: memcontrol: enable kmem accounting for all cgroups in the legacy hierarchy Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: memcontrol: enable kmem accounting for all  cgroups in the legacy hierarchy Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-02-08 06:50 +0100
  [PATCH 4/5] radix-tree: account radix_tree_node to memory cgroup Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/5] radix-tree: account radix_tree_node to memory cgroup Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-02-08 07:10 +0100
  [PATCH 5/5] mm: workingset: make shadow node shrinker memcg aware Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: workingset: make shadow node shrinker memcg aware Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-02-08 07:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: workingset: make shadow node shrinker memcg aware Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-08 15:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: workingset: make shadow node shrinker memcg aware Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-02-08 21:50 +0100
  [PATCH 3/5] mm: memcontrol: zap memcg_kmem_online helper Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: memcontrol: zap memcg_kmem_online helper Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-02-08 06:50 +0100

csiph-web