Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1329545
| From | Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules |
| Date | 2016-02-08 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r00Li-1TO-57@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qYgKt-1Kh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYgKt-1Kh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r00rT-1Mq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
+++ Josh Poimboeuf [08/02/16 14:10 -0600]: >On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:11:07PM -0500, Jessica Yu wrote: >> For livepatch modules, copy Elf section, symbol, and string information >> from the load_info struct in the module loader. Persist copies of the >> original symbol table and string table. >> >> Livepatch manages its own relocation sections in order to reuse module >> loader code to write relocations. Livepatch modules must preserve Elf >> information such as section indices in order to apply livepatch relocation >> sections using the module loader's apply_relocate_add() function. >> >> In order to apply livepatch relocation sections, livepatch modules must >> keep a complete copy of their original symbol table in memory. Normally, a >> stripped down copy of a module's symbol table (containing only "core" >> symbols) is made available through module->core_symtab. But for livepatch >> modules, the symbol table copied into memory on module load must be exactly >> the same as the symbol table produced when the patch module was compiled. >> This is because the relocations in each livepatch relocation section refer >> to their respective symbols with their symbol indices, and the original >> symbol indices (and thus the symtab ordering) must be preserved in order >> for apply_relocate_add() to find the right symbol. > >This patch didn't apply clean to linux-next/master. I didn't >investigate why, but maybe it depends on the other patch set which >removes the notifiers? (If so, that should be mentioned in the cover >letter.) A very recent commit (8244062ef) introduced some changes kernel/module.c that intersect with this patch, so I think this is why the patch didn't apply cleanly to today's tree...Anyhow I will rebase again before sending out v5. Thanks for the comments :-) Jessica
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH v4 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-02-04 02:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-02-08 21:20 +0100
Re: module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-02-08 21:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-02-09 09:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-02-09 11:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-02-09 13:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2016-02-10 01:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-02-10 17:00 +0100
csiph-web