Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1278500
| From | Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: mm: clean up probe_memory_block_size() |
| Date | 2015-11-27 03:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qzh73-58j-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qysnT-4vl-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qz0SB-3aI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> wrote:
>
> > The cumulative effect of bdee237c and 982792c7 is some pretty convoluted
> > code. This commit has no (intended) functional change; just seeks to
> > simplify and make the code more understandable.
> >
> > The whole section with the "tail size" doesn't seem to be reachable,
> > since both the >= 64GB and < 64GB case return, so it was removed.
> >
> > This commit also adds code back for the UV case since it seemed to just
> > go away without reason in bdee237c and might lead to unexpected change
> > in behavior.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 22 ++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > index ec081fe..a83c470 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
> > #include <asm/numa.h>
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > #include <asm/init.h>
> > +#include <asm/uv/uv.h>
> > #include <asm/setup.h>
> >
> > #include "mm_internal.h"
> > @@ -1194,26 +1195,15 @@ int kern_addr_valid(unsigned long addr)
> >
> > static unsigned long probe_memory_block_size(void)
> > {
> > + unsigned long bz = MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
> >
> > + /* if system is UV or has 64GB of RAM or more, use large blocks */
> > + if (is_uv_system() || ((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >= (64UL << 30))) {
> > pr_info("Using 2GB memory block size for large-memory system\n");
> > + bz = 2UL << 30; /* 2GB */
> > }
> >
> > + pr_debug("memory block size : %ldMB\n", bz >> 20);
> >
> > return bz;
> > }
>
> So why keep 'bz' at all? Just return with the right value and be done with it.
> 'bz' is just an unnecessary confusion factor.
Good point. Just send out v2.
Thanks,
Seth
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] x86: mm: clean up probe_memory_block_size() Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-11-24 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86: mm: clean up probe_memory_block_size() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-11-26 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86: mm: clean up probe_memory_block_size() Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-11-27 03:40 +0100
csiph-web