Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1279176
| From | Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL |
| Date | 2015-11-28 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qzQRc-2PH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qzaff-Tv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzbuG-1By-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzQRc-2PH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 06:40:03PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:30:31PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:01:34PM +0100, martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > > > From: Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@ts.fujitsu.com> > > > > > > Since b8b2c7d845d5, platform_drv_probe() is called for all platform > > > devices. If drv->probe is NULL, and dev_pm_domain_attach() fails, > > > platform_drv_probe() will return the error code from dev_pm_domain_attach(). > > > > > > This causes real_probe() to enter the "probe_failed" path and set > > > dev->driver to NULL. Before b8b2c7d845d5, real_probe() would assume > > > success if both dev->bus->probe and drv->probe are missing. > > > > > > This may cause a panic later. For example, inserting the tpm_tis > > > driver with parameter "force=1" (i.e. registering tpm_tis as a platform > > > driver) will panic in tpmm_chip_alloc() because dev->driver is NULL: > > > > > > chip->cdev.owner = chip->pdev->driver->owner; > > > > Is this happening because tpm_tis is not creating the platform device > > properly? ie it just calls platform_device_register_simple and then > > force initializes it via tpm_tis_init, which expects to be called from > > a probe function with an attached driver. > > Agreed. We should have a probe callback. > > > Instead we should setup a proper platform device with the default > > IO range for x86 and let the driver core call tpm_tis_init via > > tis_drv.probe. > > > > Would changing things in this way fix the problem you've observed? > > > > I have some patches to do this that are part of my OF enablement > > series, but I can make something simpler that would deal with this > > fairly quickly if you can test. > > Does the patch set that you sent include the fix or not? I haven't yet > reviewed them properly. Another question: does you patch series include an alternative fix for the probe bug or should I just pick Martins fix? As I sad previously I was seriously lost with the race but now I understand what you and Martin were saying (and feel utterly stupid + ashamed!). Now I'm just thinking, which fix I should pick. Anyway, I'll try to go through your code ASAP. /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com - 2015-11-26 20:20 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-26 21:40 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL "Wilck, Martin" <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com> - 2015-11-27 08:40 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-28 17:50 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-28 17:50 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-29 00:00 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-30 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> - 2015-11-27 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL "Wilck, Martin" <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com> - 2015-11-30 08:50 +0100
[PATCH v2] base/platform: return success when probe function is NULL martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com - 2015-11-30 13:00 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-28 17:40 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> - 2015-11-29 11:00 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-30 14:00 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-30 14:10 +0100
csiph-web