Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1276937
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges |
| Date | 2015-11-25 02:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qywBc-79D-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qy9lg-zO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qy9lg-zO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyug2-5Jl-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qywhQ-728-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qywrw-75M-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:34:19 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > >> > IOW, a very good description of the problem-being-solved would help out >> > a lot here... >> >> I'll fold the eventual result of this discussion into the changelog if >> I can convince you it's worth moving forward. > > I'm easily convinced ;) Please let's get all the info into the right > place, make sure it answers the thus-far-asked questions (at least) and > we'll take it from there. > > And please do have a think about switching as much as possible over to > runtime-configurability. Because "please echo foo > /proc" is a heck > of a lot nicer than "please reboot with iomem=" which is a heck of a lot > nicer than "please ask vendor for a new kernel". I think run-time config for this should be an as-needed case. Nothing should be fiddling with this memory from userspace anyway -- a driver covering it should be unloaded first. And, with my dosemu maintainer hat on, If you're using dosemu in a mode where this will cause a problem, you are already running a custom kernel. :) And that said, if someone can actually produce a case where we need this runtime configurable, I'm all for it. I just don't think we need to design it in right now. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-24 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-24 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-25 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-25 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-11-25 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-25 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-25 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-11-26 12:10 +0100
csiph-web