Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1276627

Re: [PATCH] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Improve clock error handling and reporting

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Geert,

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:08:13PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> If the Renesas External IRQ Pin driver cannot find a functional clock,
> >> it prints a warning, .e.g.
> >>
> >>     renesas_intc_irqpin fe78001c.interrupt-controller: unable to get clock
> >>
> >> and continues, as the clock is optional, depending on the SoC type.
> >> This warning may confuse users.
> >>
> >> To fix this, add a flag to indicate that the clock is mandatory or
> >> optional, and add a few more compatible entries:
> >>   - If the clock is mandatory (on R-Mobile A1 or SH-Mobile AG5), a
> >>     missing clock is now treated as a fatal error,
> >>   - If the clock is optional (on R-Car Gen1, or using the generic
> >>     "renesas,intc-irqpin" compatible value), the warning is no longer
> >>     printed.
> >>
> >> This requires making struct intc_irqpin_irlm_config more generic by
> >> renaming it to intc_irqpin_config, and adding a flag to indicate if IRLM
> >> is needed.
> >> The new clock flag is merged with the existing shared_irqs boolean into
> >> a bitfield to save space.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >> ---
> >> Tested on
> >>   - r8a7779/marzen (no functional clock),
> >>   - r8a7740/armadillo (with and without mandatory functional clock),
> >>   - sh73a0/kzm9g (with and without mandatory functional clock).
> >>
> >>  drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > I'll pick up this a the previous series you just sent (fyi: tglx).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c
> >> index 7f6cf19aa6ac00d7..713177d97c7aa0b6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c
> >> @@ -79,12 +79,15 @@ struct intc_irqpin_priv {
> >>       struct irq_chip irq_chip;
> >>       struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> >>       struct clk *clk;
> >> -     bool shared_irqs;
> >> +     unsigned shared_irqs:1;
> >> +     unsigned needs_clk:1;
> >>       u8 shared_irq_mask;
> >>  };
> >>
> >> -struct intc_irqpin_irlm_config {
> >> +struct intc_irqpin_config {
> >>       unsigned int irlm_bit;
> >> +     unsigned needs_irlm:1;
> >> +     unsigned needs_clk:1;
> >>  };
> >
> > Why not just stick with bool?  Changing shared_irqs -> has_shared_irqs?
> 
> That's another option. It depends on how many flags we will add in the
> future...

Nope, you're right.

> >>  static unsigned long intc_irqpin_read32(void __iomem *iomem)
> >> @@ -359,8 +362,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops intc_irqpin_irq_domain_ops = {
> >>       .xlate  = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
> >>  };
> >>
> >> -static const struct intc_irqpin_irlm_config intc_irqpin_irlm_r8a777x = {
> >> +static const struct intc_irqpin_config intc_irqpin_irlm_r8a777x = {
> >>       .irlm_bit = 23, /* ICR0.IRLM0 */
> >> +     .needs_irlm = 1,
> >> +     .needs_clk = 0,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct intc_irqpin_config intc_irqpin_rmobile = {
> >> +     .needs_irlm = 0,
> >> +     .needs_clk = 1,
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  static const struct of_device_id intc_irqpin_dt_ids[] = {
> >> @@ -369,12 +379,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id intc_irqpin_dt_ids[] = {
> >>         .data = &intc_irqpin_irlm_r8a777x },
> >>       { .compatible = "renesas,intc-irqpin-r8a7779",
> >>         .data = &intc_irqpin_irlm_r8a777x },
> >> +     { .compatible = "renesas,intc-irqpin-r8a7740",
> >> +       .data = &intc_irqpin_rmobile },
> >> +     { .compatible = "renesas,intc-irqpin-sh73a0",
> >> +       .data = &intc_irqpin_rmobile },
> >>       {},
> >>  };
> >>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, intc_irqpin_dt_ids);
> >
> > Add these compatibles and the clock requirement info to the devicetree
> > binding?
> 
> Already there, cfr.
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,intc-irqpin.txt
> The clock being mandatory just wasn't enforced.

Perfect.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Improve clock error handling and reporting Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> - 2015-11-24 16:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Improve clock error  handling and reporting Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> - 2015-11-24 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Improve clock error handling  and reporting Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-11-24 16:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Improve clock error  handling and reporting Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> - 2015-11-24 17:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Improve clock error  handling and reporting Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> - 2015-11-24 18:00 +0100

csiph-web