Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1276551
| From | Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case |
| Date | 2015-11-24 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qynod-1lP-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qxYzw-1JL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxYJc-1N0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxYJc-1N0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxZ2y-29g-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qynez-130-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | RTSoft Software Development Center |
> I'm still trying to understand what is going on, and my printk()s show > that this is not entirely true. > > When smp_init() is entered on mainline om imx6s, cpu_possible_mask and > cpu_present_mask both contain two cpus. These get initialized in > arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() and stay unmodified since then. > > But cpu_online() returns 1 for cpu0 and 0 from cpu1 - thus it is > cpu_online() check, not possible_mask or present_mask, that prevents > cpu1 initialization attempt. Sorry was too quick to type. cpu_online(0) is true and cpu_online(1) is false. It is natural, since cpu0 is already running. Thus cpu_up(1) is entered! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru - 2015-11-23 13:00 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-23 13:10 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-23 13:20 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-23 13:50 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-23 13:20 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2015-11-23 13:40 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-23 13:50 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-23 14:10 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-24 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-24 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-24 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-24 16:40 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-28 12:20 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-30 09:30 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> - 2015-11-23 13:50 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: do not skip SMP init calls on SMP_ON_UP case Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-23 13:10 +0100
csiph-web