Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1276454
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, vmscan: do not overestimate anonymous reclaimable pages |
| Date | 2015-11-24 14:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qylZ8-g8-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qykql-7Cj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qykql-7Cj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qylw7-5A-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 24-11-15 16:07:40, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:55:00PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > zone_reclaimable_pages considers all anonymous pages on LRUs reclaimable > > if there is at least one entry on the swap storage left. This can be > > really misleading when the swap is short on space and skew reclaim > > decisions based on zone_reclaimable_pages. Fix this by clamping the > > number to the minimum of the available swap space and anon LRU pages. > > Suppose there's 100M of swap and 1G of anon pages. This patch makes > zone_reclaimable_pages return 100M instead of 1G in this case. If you > rotate 600M of oldest anon pages, which is quite possible, > zone_reclaimable will start returning false, which is wrong, because > there are still 400M pages that were not even scanned, besides those > 600M of rotated pages could have become reclaimable after their ref bits > got cleared. Uhm, OK, I guess you are right. Making zone_reclaimable less conservative can lead to hard to expect results. Scratch this patch please. > I think it is the name of zone_reclaimable_pages which is misleading. It > should be called something like "zone_scannable_pages" judging by how it > is used in zone_reclaimable. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] 2 zone_pages_reclaimable fixes Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-11-24 13:00 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] mm, vmscan: do not overestimate anonymous reclaimable pages Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-11-24 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, vmscan: do not overestimate anonymous reclaimable pages Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2015-11-24 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, vmscan: do not overestimate anonymous reclaimable pages Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-11-24 14:40 +0100
[PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: consider isolated pages in zone_reclaimable_pages Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-11-24 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: consider isolated pages in zone_reclaimable_pages Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2015-11-24 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: consider isolated pages in zone_reclaimable_pages Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2015-11-24 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: consider isolated pages in zone_reclaimable_pages David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-11-25 12:10 +0100
csiph-web