Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1276031
| From | Damien Riegel <damien.riegel@savoirfairelinux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] watchdog: ts4800: add driver for TS-4800 watchdog |
| Date | 2015-11-24 04:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qybZL-25O-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qy1e2-3DU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qy1e2-3DU-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qybGq-1Y4-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 06:32:15PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Damien,
>
> On 11/23/2015 07:17 AM, Damien Riegel wrote:
> >This watchdog is instantiated in a FPGA that is memory mapped. It is
> >made of only one register, called the feed register. Writing to this
> >register will re-arm the watchdog for a given time (and enable it if it
> >was disable). It can be disabled by writing a special value into it.
> >
> >It is part of a syscon block, and the watchdog register offset in this
> >block varies from board to board. This offset is passed in the syscon
> >property after the phandle to the syscon node.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Damien Riegel <damien.riegel@savoirfairelinux.com>
> >---
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >+
> >+static int ts4800_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> >+ unsigned int timeout)
> >+{
> >+ struct ts4800_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
> >+ int i;
> >+
> >+ for (i = 0; i <= MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX; i++) {
> >+ if (ts4800_wdt_map[i].timeout >= timeout)
> >+ break;
> >+ }
>
> If the loop does not break, i will have a value of MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX + 1,
> or 2, pointing after the end of the table. That should never happen,
> but still ...
That should never happen, but indeed it's not very elegant. I will
change that.
>
> I preferred the earlier version, where you had an extra function.
As I have to set both wdd->timeout and wdt->feed_val, I found it easier
and shorter to iterate directly in the set_timeout function.
> Only my suggestion was to have that function return MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX
> instead of an error. Alternatively, the check above needs to be
> "i < MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX".
That would be a strange stop condition. Would this construct be ok for
you:
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ts4800_wdt_map; i++) {
if (ts4800_wdt_map[i].timeout >= timeout)
break;
}
if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(ts4800_wdt_map)
i = MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX;
Thanks,
Damien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v4 3/5] watchdog: ts4800: add driver for TS-4800 watchdog Damien Riegel <damien.riegel@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-11-23 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] watchdog: ts4800: add driver for TS-4800 watchdog Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-11-24 03:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] watchdog: ts4800: add driver for TS-4800 watchdog Damien Riegel <damien.riegel@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-11-24 04:00 +0100
csiph-web