Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1277035
| From | Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] ocfs2: check/fix inode block for online file check |
| Date | 2015-11-25 06:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qyB7P-1Td-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qospc-7q6-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqE2R-7ZB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyu6m-5EM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyzIK-12o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyAv8-1Ai-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/25/2015 01:04 PM, Gang He wrote: > Hi Mark and Junxiao, > > >>>> >> Hi Mark, >> >> On 11/25/2015 06:16 AM, Mark Fasheh wrote: >>> Hi Junxiao, >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:12:35PM +0800, Junxiao Bi wrote: >>>> Hi Gang, >>>> >>>> This is not like a right patch. >>>> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag, >>>> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption >>>> happened only on this field, if these fields are corrupted, that means >>>> something bad may happen on other place. So fix this field may not help >>>> and even cause corruption more hard. >>> >>> I agree that these are rather uncommon, we might even consider removing the >>> VALID_FL fixup. I definitely don't think we're ready for anything more >>> complicated than this though either. We kind of have to start somewhere too. >>> >> Yes, the fix is too simple, and just a start, I think we'd better wait >> more useful parts done before merging it. > I agree, just remark VALID_FL flag to fix this field is too simple, we should delay this field fix before > I have a flawless solution, I will remove these lines code in the first version patches. In the future submits, > I also hope your guys to help review the code carefully, shout out your comments when you doubt somewhere. Sure. > > > >>> >>>> Second, the repair way is wrong. In >>>> ocfs2_filecheck_repair_inode_block(), if these fields in disk don't >>>> match the ones in memory, the ones in memory are used to update the disk >>>> fields. The question is how do you know these field in memory are >>>> right(they may be the real corrupted ones)? >>> >>> Your second point (and the last part of your 1st point) makes a good >>> argument for why this shouldn't happen automatically. Some of these >>> corruptions might require a human to look at the log and decide what to do. >>> Especially as you point out, where we might not know where the source of the >>> corruption is. And if the human can't figure it out, then it's probably time >>> to unmount and fsck. >> The point is that the fix way is wrong, just flush memory info to disk >> is not right. I agree online fsck is good feature, but need carefully >> design, it should not involve more corruptions. A rough idea from mine >> is that maybe we need some "frezee" mechanism in fs, which can hung all >> fs op and let fs stop at a safe area. After freeze fs, we can do some >> fsck work on it and these works should not cost lots time. What's your idea? > If we need to touch some global data structures, freezing fs can be considered when we can't > get any way in case using the locks. > If we only handle some independent problem, we just need to lock the related data structures. Hmm, I am not sure whether it's hard to decide an independent issue. Thanks, Junxiao. > >> >> Thanks, >> Junxiao. >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> --Mark >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Fasheh >>> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] ocfs2: check/fix inode block for online file check Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> - 2015-11-24 23:20 +0100
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] ocfs2: check/fix inode block for online file check Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> - 2015-11-25 05:20 +0100
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] ocfs2: check/fix inode block for online file check "Gang He" <ghe@suse.com> - 2015-11-25 06:10 +0100
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] ocfs2: check/fix inode block for online file check Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> - 2015-11-25 06:50 +0100
csiph-web