Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1275464
| From | Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest |
| Date | 2015-11-23 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qy0UG-3v4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qxTJw-76I-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxTTc-7a2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxZFg-2qN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qy08i-2R4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qy0rF-30z-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang > >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees. > > > > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch? > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt > > I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and > everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is > that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major > kernel release. Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt" that's like to become stable over time. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest <jianchuan.wang@windriver.com> - 2015-11-23 08:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-11-23 08:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-23 14:50 +0100
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-11-23 16:10 +0100
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-23 15:40 +0100
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-11-23 16:10 +0100
csiph-web