Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1275272
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] vmscan: do not force-scan file lru if its absolute size is small |
| Date | 2015-11-23 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qxYga-1C0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qx1J7-4qZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxWHp-x4-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon 23-11-15 13:39:33, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> We assume there is enough inactive page cache if the size of inactive
> file lru is greater than the size of active file lru, in which case we
> force-scan file lru ignoring anonymous pages. While this logic works
> fine when there are plenty of page cache pages, it fails if the size of
> file lru is small (several MB): in this case (lru_size >> prio) will be
> 0 for normal scan priorities, as a result, if inactive file lru happens
> to be larger than active file lru, anonymous pages of a cgroup will
> never get evicted unless the system experiences severe memory pressure,
> even if there are gigabytes of unused anonymous memory there, which is
> unfair in respect to other cgroups, whose workloads might be page cache
> oriented.
>
> This patch attempts to fix this by elaborating the "enough inactive page
> cache" check: it makes it not only check that inactive lru size > active
> lru size, but also that we will scan something from the cgroup at the
> current scan priority. If these conditions do not hold, we proceed to
> SCAN_FRACT as usual.
Yes this makes sense. FWIW I have a similar patch waiting for feedback
from testing which catches the other extreme case when we force anon
pages scan without any progress from the kswapd context (I hope I get to
post it soon).
get_scan_count is getting more and more convoluted :/
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks!
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - remove unnecessary > 0 (Johannes)
> - elaborate on the comment (Andrew)
>
> mm/vmscan.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index bd2918e6391a..97ba9e1cde09 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2043,10 +2043,16 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
> }
>
> /*
> - * There is enough inactive page cache, do not reclaim
> - * anything from the anonymous working set right now.
> + * If there is enough inactive page cache, i.e. if the size of the
> + * inactive list is greater than that of the active list *and* the
> + * inactive list actually has some pages to scan on this priority, we
> + * do not reclaim anything from the anonymous working set right now.
> + * Without the second condition we could end up never scanning an
> + * lruvec even if it has plenty of old anonymous pages unless the
> + * system is under heavy pressure.
> */
> - if (!inactive_file_is_low(lruvec)) {
> + if (!inactive_file_is_low(lruvec) &&
> + get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE) >> sc->priority) {
> scan_balance = SCAN_FILE;
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] vmscan: do not force-scan file lru if its absolute size is small Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2015-11-20 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] vmscan: do not force-scan file lru if its absolute size is small Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2015-11-20 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] vmscan: do not force-scan file lru if its absolute size is small Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-20 22:50 +0100
[PATCH v2] vmscan: do not force-scan file lru if its absolute size is small Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2015-11-23 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] vmscan: do not force-scan file lru if its absolute size is small Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-11-23 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] vmscan: do not force-scan file lru if its absolute size is small Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2015-11-23 17:40 +0100
csiph-web