Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1273055
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction |
| Date | 2015-11-19 12:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwvzB-by-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <qw6KS-Af-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwr2V-5I2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwrcB-5Lq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwuDv-820-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwuWR-88v-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 06:43:14PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: > Also, why not fixing rsp in kernel if that instruction is a 'callq'? > For avoiding instruction decoding? Why would the kernel do that? It doesn't need this. Have userspace do it when trying to interpret the data. If PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT is set, you know the IP points to the actual instruction and you can attempt to undo whatever parts of it you need at post processing time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-11-18 08:30 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-11-18 09:20 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-11-18 09:30 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-11-18 10:00 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-11-19 07:40 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-11-19 07:50 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-11-19 11:30 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-11-19 11:50 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-19 12:30 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-19 12:30 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-11-27 09:40 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-30 10:30 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-11-18 10:10 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-11-18 09:50 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-11-18 10:20 +0100
csiph-web