Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1272951
| From | Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 |
| Date | 2015-11-19 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwtxL-7n4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qvgVX-M3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvgVX-M3-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwoRr-4oH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwpu9-4BN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2015-11-19 13:51 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>: > On 19.11.2015 13:18, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> However, I don't think we can disable compilation of particular 64-bit >> SoCs, so maybe there isn't much sense in splitting their clock drivers >> into separate symbols? > > To me it does not really matter. Indeed as you said one cannot disable > building of one particular Exynos SoCs. > > However we could still want not build some parts of such SoCs (like > clock, pinctrl etc). I don't see much benefit for such case except when > someone would like to drastically reduce the size of kernel image (for > whatever reasons he has.). Can we really build a kernel that support selected Exynos SoC without its clock driver? Actually I don't think we even allow deselecting clock drivers currently, because they are not visible in menuconfig. Unless there is a clear goal to separate ARCH level Kconfig symbol for particular ARM64-based Exynos SoCs, I don't think it makes any sense to keep the clock-related symbols separate. > > On the other hand having separate symbols causes duplication and > obfuscates a little the Kconfig/Makefile. I like keeping things simple > so one symbol for all ARM64 Exynos clocks sounds good. > > Sylwester preferred current approach. You and Pankaj seem to prefer one > symbol-way. Hmm, I read Sylwester's post as a reply to your original message and not Pankaj's. Sylwester, could you clarify? Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 05:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-19 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-19 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> - 2015-11-19 12:10 +0100
csiph-web