Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1272558
| From | Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) |
| Date | 2015-11-18 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwhPY-84P-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <qvSye-8a9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvSye-8a9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvTkC-f2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvX4R-2FN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwghc-77w-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Brian Norris wrote: > (changing subject, add devicetree@vger.kernel.org) > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:33:25PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Brian Norris wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:48:39PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > Is this something that should be checked for elsewhere? > > > > > > I expect the same sort of problem shows up plenty of other places. I > > > don't think many people use CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC, so the effects of these > > > failures probably aren't felt by many. > > > > I tried the following semantic patch: > > > > @@ > > struct device_node *e; > > expression e1; > > identifier fld; > > @@ > > > > ... when != of_node_get(...) > > *(<+...e1->fld...+>) = e > > ... when != of_node_get(...) > > return e1; > > > > basically, this says that a structure field is initilized to a device node > > value, the structure is returned by the containing function, and the > > containing function contains no of_node_get at all. Certainly this is > > quite constrained, but it does produce a number of examples. > > > > I looked at a few of them: > > > > drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c, ingenic_cgu_new > > clk/pistachio/clk.c, pistachio_clk_alloc_provider > > It looks like the clock core (drivers/clk/clk.c) initially grabs the clk > provider node in of_clk_init(), then drops it after it's initialized, > but most of these providers use of_clk_add_provider(), which seems to > manage the device_node lifetime for the user. So I think these are OK. > > > drivers/mfd/syscon.c, of_syscon_register > > This one looks potentially suspect. Syscon nodes aren't usually directly > managed by a single driver, and the device_node pointer is used for > lookups later...so I think it should keep a kref, and it doesn't. > > > drivers/of/pdt.c, function of_pdt_create_node > > Not real sure about this one. > > > Any idea whether these need of_node_get? In all cases the device node > > value comes in as a parameter. > > I'm really not an expert on this stuff. I just saw a potential problem > that I happen to be looking at in other subsystems, and I wanted to know > what others thought. Thanks for the analysis. I will look into them a bit more. Hopefully at least the maintainer of each file will know what should be done. julia > I think this discussion should include the DT folks > and the subsystems in question. For one, I'm as interested as anyone in > getting this todo clarified: > > Documentation/devicetree/todo.txt > - Document node lifecycle for CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC > > Regards, > Brian > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/7] add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-16 12:50 +0100
[PATCH 3/7] phy: berlin-sata: add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-16 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/7] phy: berlin-sata: add missing of_node_put Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 21:50 +0100
[PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-16 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 02:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-17 07:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-17 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-17 23:40 +0100
device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 20:10 +0100
Re: device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-18 21:50 +0100
Re: device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-11-19 19:50 +0100
Re: device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-19 20:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2015-11-27 15:20 +0100
[PATCH 7/7] phy: cygnus: pcie: add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-11-16 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 7/7] phy: cygnus: pcie: add missing of_node_put Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> - 2015-11-16 18:20 +0100
csiph-web