Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1272448

Re: [PATCH 3/3] security/apparmor: do not define list_entry_next

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/18/2015 04:14 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Cosmetic.
> 
> Do not define list_entry_next() and use list_next_entry()
> from list.h.
> 

two days to late,

Geliang Tang already submitted the same patch in
[PATCH 3/3] apparmor: use list_next_entry instead of list_entry_next

and I've pulled it into my tree

still thank you for your work, it is appreciated

> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> ---
>  security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c b/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
> index ad4fa49..946e8fd 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #include <linux/namei.h>
>  #include <linux/capability.h>
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
>  
>  #include "include/apparmor.h"
>  #include "include/apparmorfs.h"
> @@ -549,9 +550,6 @@ fail2:
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> -
> -#define list_entry_next(pos, member) \
> -	list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member)
>  #define list_entry_is_head(pos, head, member) (&pos->member == (head))
>  
>  /**
> @@ -582,7 +580,7 @@ static struct aa_namespace *__next_namespace(struct aa_namespace *root,
>  	parent = ns->parent;
>  	while (ns != root) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&ns->lock);
> -		next = list_entry_next(ns, base.list);
> +		next = list_next_entry(ns, base.list);
>  		if (!list_entry_is_head(next, &parent->sub_ns, base.list)) {
>  			mutex_lock(&next->lock);
>  			return next;
> @@ -636,7 +634,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *__next_profile(struct aa_profile *p)
>  	parent = rcu_dereference_protected(p->parent,
>  					   mutex_is_locked(&p->ns->lock));
>  	while (parent) {
> -		p = list_entry_next(p, base.list);
> +		p = list_next_entry(p, base.list);
>  		if (!list_entry_is_head(p, &parent->base.profiles, base.list))
>  			return p;
>  		p = parent;
> @@ -645,7 +643,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *__next_profile(struct aa_profile *p)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* is next another profile in the namespace */
> -	p = list_entry_next(p, base.list);
> +	p = list_next_entry(p, base.list);
>  	if (!list_entry_is_head(p, &ns->base.profiles, base.list))
>  		return p;
>  
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 3/3] security/apparmor: do not define list_entry_next Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 13:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 3/3] security/apparmor: do not define list_entry_next John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> - 2015-11-18 19:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] security/apparmor: do not define list_entry_next Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 01:20 +0100

csiph-web