Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1272329
| From | Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection |
| Date | 2015-11-18 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwdjm-4US-47@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qusFP-2eI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qusFQ-2eI-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwd9D-4Pa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/18/2015 7:44 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > I would not necessarily want to punish all cpus > system-wide if we have local overheating in one corner. If would rather > have it apply to only the overheating socket in a multi-socket machine > and only the big cores in a big.LITTLE system. most of the time thermal issues aren't inside the SOC, but on a system level due to cheap heat spreaders or outright lack of space due to thinness. But even if you have one part of the die too hot: For core level idle injection, no need to synchronize that; the reason to synchronize is generally that when ALL cores are idle, additional power savings kick in (like memory going to self refresh, fabrics power gating etc); those additional power savings are what makes this more efficient than just voltage/frequency scaling at the bottom of that range... not so much the fact that things are just idle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-18 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-11-19 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-19 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-20 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-20 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-20 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-20 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-20 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-24 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-23 19:00 +0100
csiph-web