Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1274219
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities |
| Date | 2015-11-20 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwWq6-11X-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qwGOm-7Dg-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwQE2-5uX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 09:59:05AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > 3) normally, readlink(2) fails for non-symlinks. Moreover, according to > > POSIX it should do so (with -EINVAL). There is a pathological case when > > it succeeds for a directory, though. Namely, one of the kinds of AFS > > "mountpoints". > > All AFS mountpoints are magic symlinks that are specially interpreted by the > client as far as I'm aware. I'm not sure why the designers didn't just select > a different file type for them, but they didn't. All of them? I see two kinds there - one is magical symlink (recognized by contents in afs_iget()), another is this autocell thing, the latter having no ->readlink(). Both serve as automount points, don't they? > > stat(2) reports those as directories, stepping into them leads to > > automounting a directory there (why do we have ->open() for them, BTW?). > > I think I put that in to make sure the open() syscall returned EREMOTE rather > than another error if you tried to open it. It can probably be removed > because with the d_automount code you can't ever get there I think - unless > you can pass AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT to openat(). Just how would openat() get the AT_... flags? Only statat(2) accepts AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT, sorry. > > How the hell is userland supposed to guess to call readlink(2) on those > > suckers to get the information of what'll get automounted there if we step > > upon them? > > There's an AFS userspace command that could be used to query a mountpoint that > was going to use it. However, I suspect readlink() will now always trigger > the automount. This is one of the things OpenAFS uses pioctl() for - but > since I'm not allowed to add that to the kernel, I have to find some other way > of doing it. Well, pioctl() is a piec^H^Hle of shit interface; let's figure out what we'd actually want to implement and do that. One obvious thing is "here's a pathname, tell me what gets automounted here" (with interesting question of what to do if the automount is being triggered right now). Another thing is locating those guys; if we had a separate file type for them (i.e. could recognize them by st_mode _and_ d_type), we would be fine (the usual tree-walkers would be able to spot such places and query them for prospective automount targets), but without that... a syscall for everything in a tree just to list those suckers? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] readlink()-related oddities Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-20 00:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-20 03:20 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-20 04:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-20 04:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-20 04:20 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-20 04:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-11-20 11:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-11-20 11:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-20 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-11-20 17:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] readlink()-related oddities Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-20 23:40 +0100
csiph-web