Re: Future of Lustre in staging

From	Denis Kirjanov <kirjanov@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Future of Lustre in staging
Date	2015-11-20 13:40 +0100
Message-ID	<qwT8S-7d6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qwT8S-7d6-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/20/15, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From https://lwn.net/Articles/662979/
>
> --cut--
> Christoph complained a bit about the staging tree. He said that it
> breaks allmodconfig builds, but that problem was evidently fixed a while
> ago. He also dislikes the Lustre filesystem, which has been in staging
> for some time now; Greg agreed and said that he would like to delete it.
> It was generally agreed that the work being done on Lustre is not
> substantial enough to justify its continued presence. Christoph also
> said that the use of the staging tree for code that is about to be
> deleted could be improved; there are, he said, people doing white-space
> fixes on doomed code.
> --end--
>
> Could anyone clarify it?

AFAIK, Intel is going to work more harder on Lustre code, so the best
option would be to wait a bit.
Agreed, checkpatch fixes are just a mess..

>
> -thanks-
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@linuxdriverproject.org
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
>


-- 
Regards / Mit besten Grüßen,
Denis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Future of Lustre in staging Denis Kirjanov <kirjanov@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 13:40 +0100
  Re: Future of Lustre in staging "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> - 2015-11-24 00:40 +0100

csiph-web