Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1273831
| From | Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk() |
| Date | 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwPoD-4LV-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qwPeW-4Iu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync() alone uses pte_list_walk(), witch does
nearly the same as the for_each_rmap_spte macro. The only difference
is that is_shadow_present_pte() checks cannot be placed there because
kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync() can be called with a new parent pointer
whose entry is not set yet.
By calling mark_unsync() separately for the parent and adding the parent
pointer to the parent_ptes chain later in kvm_mmu_get_page(), the macro
works with no problem.
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 7f46e3e..4e29d9a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1007,26 +1007,6 @@ static void pte_list_remove(u64 *spte, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
}
}
-typedef void (*pte_list_walk_fn) (u64 *spte);
-static void pte_list_walk(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head, pte_list_walk_fn fn)
-{
- struct pte_list_desc *desc;
- int i;
-
- if (!rmap_head->val)
- return;
-
- if (!(rmap_head->val & 1))
- return fn((u64 *)rmap_head->val);
-
- desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(rmap_head->val & ~1ul);
- while (desc) {
- for (i = 0; i < PTE_LIST_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
- fn(desc->sptes[i]);
- desc = desc->more;
- }
-}
-
static struct kvm_rmap_head *__gfn_to_rmap(gfn_t gfn, int level,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
{
@@ -1749,7 +1729,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int direct
static void mark_unsync(u64 *spte);
static void kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
- pte_list_walk(&sp->parent_ptes, mark_unsync);
+ u64 *sptep;
+ struct rmap_iterator iter;
+
+ for_each_rmap_spte(&sp->parent_ptes, &iter, sptep) {
+ mark_unsync(sptep);
+ }
}
static void mark_unsync(u64 *spte)
@@ -2119,12 +2104,17 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (sp->unsync && kvm_sync_page_transient(vcpu, sp))
break;
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
if (sp->unsync_children) {
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, vcpu);
kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
- } else if (sp->unsync)
+ if (parent_pte)
+ mark_unsync(parent_pte);
+ } else if (sp->unsync) {
kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
+ if (parent_pte)
+ mark_unsync(parent_pte);
+ }
+ mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp);
trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, false);
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V3 00/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:30 +0100
[PATCH 01/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Encapsulate the type of rmap-chain head in a new struct Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:30 +0100
[PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Consolidate BUG_ON checks for reverse-mapped sptes Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
[PATCH 04/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Make mmu_set_spte() return emulate value Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
[PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk() Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk() Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-20 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk() Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk() Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-11-25 17:30 +0100
[PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page() Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page() Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-20 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page() Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-11-25 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page() Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-26 03:40 +0100
[PATCH 05/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove is_rmap_spte() and use is_shadow_present_pte() Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
[PATCH 03/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Add helper function to clear a bit in unsync child bitmap Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
[PATCH 07/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move initialization of parent_ptes out from kvm_mmu_alloc_page() Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
[PATCH 10/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove unused parameter parent_pte from kvm_mmu_get_page() Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2015-11-20 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-20 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-11-20 17:10 +0100
csiph-web