Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1273780

Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count

Show key headers only | View raw

> 
> When dequeue_huge_page_vma() in alloc_huge_page() fails, we fall back to
> alloc_buddy_huge_page() to directly create a hugepage from the buddy allocator.
> In that case, however, if alloc_buddy_huge_page() succeeds we don't decrement
> h->resv_huge_pages, which means that successful hugetlb_fault() returns without
> releasing the reserve count. As a result, subsequent hugetlb_fault() might fail
> despite that there are still free hugepages.
> 
> This patch simply adds decrementing code on that code path.
> 
> I reproduced this problem when testing v4.3 kernel in the following situation:
> - the test machine/VM is a NUMA system,
> - hugepage overcommiting is enabled,
> - most of hugepages are allocated and there's only one free hugepage
>   which is on node 0 (for example),
> - another program, which calls set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND) to bind itself to
>   node 1, tries to allocate a hugepage,
> - the allocation should fail but the reserve count is still hold.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.16+]
> ---
> - the reason why I set stable target to "3.16+" is that this patch can be
>   applied easily/automatically on these versions. But this bug seems to be
>   old one, so if you are interested in backporting to older kernels,
>   please let me know.
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git v4.3/mm/hugetlb.c v4.3_patched/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 9cc7734..77c518c 100644
> --- v4.3/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ v4.3_patched/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1790,7 +1790,10 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  		if (!page)
>  			goto out_uncharge_cgroup;
> -
> +		if (!avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, gbl_chg)) {
> +			SetPagePrivate(page);
> +			h->resv_huge_pages--;
> +		}

I am wondering if this patch was prepared against the next tree.

>  		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  		list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
>  		/* Fall through */
> --
> 1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> - 2015-11-20 08:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2015-11-20 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong  reserve count Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> - 2015-11-20 23:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by  wrong reserve count Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> - 2015-11-24 06:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong  reserve count Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> - 2015-11-24 19:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by  wrong reserve count Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-20 23:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by  wrong reserve count Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> - 2015-11-24 06:10 +0100

csiph-web