Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1273530
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids |
| Date | 2015-11-19 23:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwFpf-6AK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <qrZRD-3rI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qs3Vf-6iB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsnAB-22W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtiIx-6FU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwDQt-5IW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Nov 19, 2015 12:11 PM, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote: > > On Sat 07-11-15 21:02:06, Ted Tso wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:05:57PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > >> > >>>> They're certainly not used early enough -- we need to remove suid when > >> > >>>> the page becomes writable via mmap (wp_page_shared), not when > >> > >>>> writeback happens, or at least not only when writeback happens. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Well, I'm shy about the change there. For example, we don't strip in > >> > >>> on open(RDWR), just on write(). > >> > >> > >> > >> I take it back. Hooking wp_page_shared looks expensive. :) Maybe we do > >> > >> need to hook the mmap? > >> > > > >> > > But file_update_time already pokes at the same (or nearby) cachelines, > >> > > I think -- why would it be expensive? The whole thing could be > >> > > guarded by if (unlikely(is setuid)), right? > >> > > >> > Yeah, true. I added file_remove_privs calls near all the > >> > file_update_time calls, to no effect. Added to wp_page_shared too, > >> > nothing. Hmmm. > >> > >> Why not put the the should_remove_suid() call in > >> filemap_page_mkwrite(), or maybe do_page_mkwrite()? > > > > page_mkwrite() callbacks are IMHO the right place for this check (and > > change). Just next to file_update_time() call. You get proper filesystem > > Should file_update_time() just be modified to include > file_remove_privs()? They seem to regularly go together. > No, I think. The current file_update_time is slow and POSIX-noncompliant, and I have old patches I need to dig up to fix it. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-11-19 21:20 +0100
Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-19 23:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-11-19 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-11-20 01:20 +0100
csiph-web