Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1273530

Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids

From Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids
Date 2015-11-19 23:00 +0100
Message-ID <qwFpf-6AK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <qrZRD-3rI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qs3Vf-6iB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsnAB-22W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtiIx-6FU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwDQt-5IW-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Nov 19, 2015 12:11 PM, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > On Sat 07-11-15 21:02:06, Ted Tso wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:05:57PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > >>>> They're certainly not used early enough -- we need to remove suid when
> >> > >>>> the page becomes writable via mmap (wp_page_shared), not when
> >> > >>>> writeback happens, or at least not only when writeback happens.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Well, I'm shy about the change there. For example, we don't strip in
> >> > >>> on open(RDWR), just on write().
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I take it back. Hooking wp_page_shared looks expensive. :) Maybe we do
> >> > >> need to hook the mmap?
> >> > >
> >> > > But file_update_time already pokes at the same (or nearby) cachelines,
> >> > > I think -- why would it be expensive?  The whole thing could be
> >> > > guarded by if (unlikely(is setuid)), right?
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, true. I added file_remove_privs calls near all the
> >> > file_update_time calls, to no effect. Added to wp_page_shared too,
> >> > nothing. Hmmm.
> >>
> >> Why not put the the should_remove_suid() call in
> >> filemap_page_mkwrite(), or maybe do_page_mkwrite()?
> >
> > page_mkwrite() callbacks are IMHO the right place for this check (and
> > change).  Just next to file_update_time() call. You get proper filesystem
>
> Should file_update_time() just be modified to include
> file_remove_privs()? They seem to regularly go together.
>

No, I think.  The current file_update_time is slow and
POSIX-noncompliant, and I have old patches I need to dig up to fix it.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-11-19 21:20 +0100
  Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-19 23:00 +0100
  Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-11-19 23:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-11-20 01:20 +0100

csiph-web