Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1

From	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1
Date	2015-11-19 20:50 +0100
Message-ID	<qwDns-5hz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qvMMa-4qX-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwzjQ-2Fh-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwBvj-40t-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday 19 November 2015 18:44:57 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 19/11/2015 16:22, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 17 November 2015 12:35:58 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
> >>
> >> This is the first "fixes" pull-request for AT91. I tried to collect little
> >> patches that didn't make it for -rc1.
> >> It can be due to synchronization between trees like the addition of some
> >> sama5d2 Xplained nodes (MFD tree) or the change of the watchdog compatible
> >> string for sama5d4 (watchdog tree).
> >> It can also be due to trivial cleanups that were spotted or submitted late like
> >> the replacement of "wakeup" properties or removal of unneeded defconfig option.
> >> The removal of some dead legacy DT properties or nodes is, in my opinion worth
> >> it as well in order to prevent us from abusive cut'n paste.
> >> NAND and ISI Atmel MAINTAINERS entries are also updated.
> >>
> >> Tell me if it's okay for you.
> > 
> > I'd be happier to get the patches late in the process and then push back
> > myself than to get them as fixes, there was really no reason to wait
> > for the merge window to end with the ones that you already had.
> 
> I thought than having a precise milestone as a base for this
> pull-request would be preferred.

It is, but if you have a branch that introduces or exposes a bug,
then I'd prefer to get a pull request with the bug fixes on top
of the branch that we already have, e.g. the at91/dt branch
(as opposed to next/dt or for-next, which would be wrong).

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-11-17 12:40 +0100
  Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-19 16:30 +0100
    Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-11-19 18:50 +0100
      Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-19 20:50 +0100

csiph-web