Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1270449
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC |
| Date | 2015-11-16 19:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qvwHo-2mv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qtkhj-7vy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtkAG-7SL-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtln5-8aF-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtm9s-gB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtn5w-Uo-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:40:38PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 11/10/2015 12:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >There's also the third option where we don't have any compatible strings > >in the subnodes at all. > Ok, two, but would you really want to go that way? Matching by node name costs > us all of the flexibility of DT sub-device selection. Still don't see an upside > as we would now be locked to node names instead of compatible strings to declare > component type compatibility (what they are for). Yes, we should go that way. No, there is nothing meaningful being lost - the fact that there is zero paramterisation in the bindings and each subfunction has the full device name as a compatible string ought to be a big red flag here.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-04 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-05 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-05 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-06 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-06 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-06 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-09 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-10 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-10 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-10 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-10 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-10 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-10 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-16 19:30 +0100
csiph-web