Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1270449

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC

From Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC
Date 2015-11-16 19:30 +0100
Message-ID <qvwHo-2mv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <qtkhj-7vy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtkAG-7SL-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtln5-8aF-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtm9s-gB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtn5w-Uo-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:40:38PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 12:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >There's also the third option where we don't have any compatible strings
> >in the subnodes at all.

> Ok, two, but would you really want to go that way? Matching by node name costs
> us all of the flexibility of DT sub-device selection. Still don't see an upside
> as we would now be locked to node names instead of compatible strings to declare
> component type compatibility (what they are for).

Yes, we should go that way.  No, there is nothing meaningful being lost
- the fact that there is zero paramterisation in the bindings and each
subfunction has the full device name as a compatible string ought to be
a big red flag here.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-04 16:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-05 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-05 19:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-06 11:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-06 19:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-06 22:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-09 18:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-10 11:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-10 17:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-10 18:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-10 19:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-10 19:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-10 20:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the  TPS65912 PMIC Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-16 19:30 +0100

csiph-web