Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1270946

Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of copying its functionality

From Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of copying its functionality
Date 2015-11-17 09:20 +0100
Message-ID <qvJEC-2sF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <qvt6O-8uH-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvyzw-3C8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvzFf-4gl-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvJbz-235-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvJuV-2p9-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/17/2015 09:06 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Alvaro, Simon,
>
> On 11/17/2015 08:42 AM, Simon Arlott wrote:
>> On 16/11/15 21:33, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>>> Still wrong, you are setting the led value after unlocking the spinlock.
>>
>> I have to unlock it because bcm6328_led_set() locks that spinlock.
>
> Commit message from the first version of the patch justified that
> properly. It should be preserved in the final patch:
>
> As bcm6328_led_set() expects to acquire the spinlock, narrow the locking
> to only cover reading of the current state. There is no need to hold the
> spinlock between reading the current value and setting it again because
> the LED device has not yet been registered.

Hmm, if so, then spin_lock in bcm6328_led isn't needed at all, as it
is guaranteed that no concurrent process will be executing this
function.

>>> El 16/11/2015 a las 21:24, Simon Arlott escribió:
>>>> When ensuring a consistent initial LED state in bcm6328_led (as they
>>>> may
>>>> be blinking instead of on/off), the LED register is set using an
>>>> inverted
>>>> copy of bcm6328_led_set(). To avoid further errors relating to
>>>> active low
>>>> handling, call this function directly instead.
>>>>
>>>> As bcm6328_led_set() acquires the same spinlock again when updating the
>>>> register, it is called after unlocking.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c | 8 ++------
>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c b/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c
>>>> index c7ea5c6..95d0cf9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c
>>>> @@ -314,14 +314,10 @@ static int bcm6328_led(struct device *dev,
>>>> struct device_node *nc, u32 reg,
>>>>        } else {
>>>>            led->cdev.brightness = LED_OFF;
>>>>        }
>>>> -
>>>> -    if ((led->active_low && led->cdev.brightness == LED_FULL) ||
>>>> -        (!led->active_low && led->cdev.brightness == LED_OFF))
>>>> -        bcm6328_led_mode(led, BCM6328_LED_MODE_ON);
>>>> -    else
>>>> -        bcm6328_led_mode(led, BCM6328_LED_MODE_OFF);
>>>>        spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
>>>>
>>>> +    bcm6328_led_set(&led->cdev, led->cdev.brightness);
>>>> +
>>>>        led->cdev.brightness_set = bcm6328_led_set;
>>>>        led->cdev.blink_set = bcm6328_blink_set;
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-16 15:40 +0100
  [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-16 21:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 22:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-17 08:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-17 09:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-17 09:20 +0100
            [PATCH 1/2 (v3)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-22 21:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v3)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-23 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of  copying its functionality Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-23 11:30 +0100

csiph-web