Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1269691
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction |
| Date | 2015-11-15 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qv54u-1vn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qun3s-77o-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qun3s-77o-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qv26C-85h-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:40:02AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > I doubt INT_MAX is useful as a budget in any use-case. it can easily > hog the CPU. If the consumer is given access to poll a CQ, it must be > able to provide some way to budget it. Why not expose a budget argument > to the consumer? Because in theory we could have a lot of sends completing before we finally need to reap them. I think that's more of a theoretical than real issue. My preference would be to simply kill this mode though. Allocate a IU to each block request in SRP and only use the free_tx list for task management and AEN/req_limit calls. Then we can use a single CQ and mark the regular I/O requests as unsignalled. AFAICS no other driver wants a similar polling mode as the SRP initiator does for it's send queue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-13 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-13 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-13 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-14 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-23 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-23 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-23 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-24 00:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-24 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-24 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> - 2015-11-24 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Caitlin Bestler <cait@asomi.com> - 2015-11-24 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-24 08:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> - 2015-11-24 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-14 08:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-11-23 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-23 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2015-11-15 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-15 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2015-11-15 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2015-11-18 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-20 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2015-11-22 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-22 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2015-11-22 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-22 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2015-11-22 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> - 2015-11-22 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-11-18 15:10 +0100
csiph-web