Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1269419

Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in push_irq_work_func

From Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in push_irq_work_func
Date 2015-11-14 05:30 +0100
Message-ID <quADo-7Dz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <quzei-6sF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:53:18 +0800
<yanjiang.jin@windriver.com> wrote:

> From: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
> 
> This can only happen in RT kernel due to run_timer_softirq() calls
> irq_work_tick() when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled as below:
> 
> static void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
> {
> ........
> if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)
>         irq_work_tick();
> endif
> ........
> }
> 
> Use raw_spin_{un,}lock_irq{save,restore} in push_irq_work_func() to
> prevent following potentially deadlock scenario:

Ug. No, the real fix is that the irq work is to be run from hard
interrupt context. Moving the scheduling of high priority real-time
tasks to ksoftirqd defeats the purpose. The question is, why is that
irq work being run from thread context when it has the
IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ flag set?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in push_irq_work_func <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com> - 2015-11-14 04:00 +0100
  Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in  push_irq_work_func Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-14 05:30 +0100
    Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in push_irq_work_func yjin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com> - 2015-11-14 06:20 +0100
      Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in  push_irq_work_func Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-15 09:20 +0100
        Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in  push_irq_work_func Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-15 09:30 +0100
          Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in  push_irq_work_func Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-15 12:10 +0100
            Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in push_irq_work_func yjin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com> - 2015-11-16 06:30 +0100

csiph-web