Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1266975
| From | "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [BUG] IB/hfi1: might sleep under spinlock in hfi1_ioctl() |
| Date | 2015-11-11 07:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtwBQ-77u-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qppyW-2yK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qprKq-3P7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:58:18PM -0400, ira. weiny wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:32:29AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > hfi1_ioctl() contains many calls to might sleep functions with > > dd->hfi1_snoop.snoop_lock spinlock held (for example, access_ok, > > copy_from_user, kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL), etc.). > > > > Should dd->hfi1_snoop.snoop_lock be acquired just before updating state? > > I believe you are correct. > > I am currently in the process of pushing fixes to the staging tree. > > We have a patch which fixes this queued up but it depends on at least one other > patch in my queue. > > I will do my best to get this submitted soon. I have just posted a series which addresses this problem as well as doing general clean up on hfi1_ioctl. The specific fix is contained in this patch. [PATCH 7/8] staging/rdma/hfi1: Reduce snoop locking scope in IOCTL handler. Thanks for the report, Ira -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [BUG] IB/hfi1: might sleep under spinlock in hfi1_ioctl() "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com> - 2015-11-11 07:00 +0100
csiph-web