Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1266947

Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance

From Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance
Date 2015-11-11 04:00 +0100
Message-ID <qttNE-5dn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <qexgt-oR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrEau-6hL-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrENc-6KU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrG2B-7zs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qttkB-528-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 06:21:47PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Al, looking at the most recent linux-next, most of the vfs commits
> there seem to be committed in the last day or two. I'm getting the
> feeling that that is all 4.5 material by now.
> 
> Should I just take the iov patch as-is, since apparently no vfs pull
> request is happening this merge cycle? And no, I'm not taking
> "developed during the second week of the merge window, and sent in the
> last few days of it". I'm done with that.

s/developed/rebased/, actually, but... point taken.  Mea culpa, and what
to do with those patches is for you to decide; some of those are simply
-stable fodder and probably ought to go one-by-one at any point you would
consider convenient, some are of the "remove stale comment" variety (obviously
can sit around until the next cycle, or go in one-by-one at any point - the
things like
-
-       /* WARNING: probably going away soon, do not use! */
in inode_operations; the comment used to be about the method removed last
cycle and should've been gone with it; etc.)

There's a large pile not in those two classes - xattr+richacl stuff.  I'm more
confident about the first part, but strictly speaking neither qualifies as
fixes.

FWIW, the stuff that had been _developed_ during the merge window is not there
- a patch series around the descriptor bitmaps.  Doesn't change the situation;
I'd fucked up this cycle ;-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 02:40 +0100
  Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 03:20 +0100
    Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-06 04:40 +0100
      Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-11-06 17:10 +0100
      Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-11 03:30 +0100
        Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-11-11 03:30 +0100
          Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-11 03:40 +0100
            Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-11-11 03:50 +0100
              Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-11-11 03:50 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 04:10 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-11-11 04:10 +0100
              Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-11-11 03:50 +0100
            Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2015-11-11 04:30 +0100
        Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 04:00 +0100
          Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 04:40 +0100
            Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-11 05:40 +0100
              Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 08:50 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-11-11 09:20 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-11-11 11:30 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> - 2015-11-11 17:30 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 17:40 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> - 2015-11-11 18:00 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 11:30 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 17:40 +0100
                Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-11-11 22:50 +0100

csiph-web