Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1266712
| From | Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ? |
| Date | 2015-11-10 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtlZM-d8-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Mighty upstream, I see that do_mounts_rd.c seems to make calls to sys_read and sys_lseek functions. As these are syscall functions, they expects some of the arguments to be from userspace. I was going through the article that Greg KH wrote a while back: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8110?page=0,1 . I don't see any references to set_fs/get_fs under init/*. Does the memory protection get enabled only in the later stage ? Or does do_mounts_rd.c accomplish this in some other way ? Thanks, Badhri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ? Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> - 2015-11-10 19:40 +0100
Re: init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 22:40 +0100
Re: init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ? Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> - 2015-11-11 02:30 +0100
csiph-web