Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1266712

init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ?

From Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ?
Date 2015-11-10 19:40 +0100
Message-ID <qtlZM-d8-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Mighty upstream,

I see that do_mounts_rd.c seems to make calls to sys_read and
sys_lseek functions. As these are syscall functions, they expects
some of the arguments to be from userspace.

I was going through the article that Greg KH wrote a while back:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8110?page=0,1 . I don't see any
references to set_fs/get_fs under init/*. Does the memory protection
get enabled only in the later stage ? Or does do_mounts_rd.c accomplish
this in some other way ?

Thanks,
Badhri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ? Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> - 2015-11-10 19:40 +0100
  Re: init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 22:40 +0100
    Re: init: How did init/do_mounts_rd.c overcome memory protection ? Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> - 2015-11-11 02:30 +0100

csiph-web