Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1266391
| From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion |
| Date | 2015-11-10 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtevg-3RD-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qt5ii-6fS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qt6Ho-7hQ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qt6Ho-7hQ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qt9Fg-QD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qt9OW-TO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 21:35 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > We could do it the other way around: on powerpc, if a PCI device is in > that range and doesn't have the "bypass" property at all, then it's > assumed to bypass the IOMMU. This means that everything that > currently works continues working. If someone builds a physical > virtio device or uses another system in PCIe target mode speaking > virtio, then it won't work until they upgrade their firmware to set > bypass=0. Meanwhile everyone using hypothetical new QEMU also gets > bypass=0 and no ambiguity. > > vfio will presumably notice the bypass and correctly refuse to map any > current virtio devices. > > Would that work? That would be extremely strange from a platform perspective. Any device in that vendor/device range would bypass the iommu unless some new property "actually-works-like-a-real-pci-device" happens to exist in the device-tree, which we would then need to define somewhere and handle accross at least 3 different platforms who get their device-tree from widly different places. Also if tomorrow I create a PCI device that implements virtio-net and put it in a machine running IBM proprietary firmware (or Apple's or Sun's), it won't have that property... This is not hypothetical. People are using virtio to do point-to-point communication between machines via PCIe today. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-11-09 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-11-09 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-10 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-10 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 06:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-10 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-11-10 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-10 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-11 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-11 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-11 05:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-11 06:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-10 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 07:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2015-11-10 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> - 2015-11-10 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> - 2015-11-10 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-11-10 20:40 +0100
csiph-web