Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1267767

Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM

From Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM
Date 2015-11-12 11:00 +0100
Message-ID <qtWPF-7f8-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qr6Lw-19D-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtIjE-6mP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtWmC-74z-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thursday 12 November 2015 09:26:33 Phil Edworthy wrote:
> On 11 November 2015 18:25, LIviu wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:

> > I think you're mixing things a bit or not explaining them very well. Having the
> > PCIe controller limited to 32-bit AXI does not mean that the PCIe bus cannot
> > carry 64-bit addresses. It depends on how they get translated by the host bridge
> > or its associated ATS block. I can't see why you can't have a setup where
> > the CPU addresses are 32-bit but the PCIe bus addresses are all 64-bit.
> > You just have to be careful on how you setup your mem64 ranges so that they
> > don't
> > overlap with the 32-bit ranges when translated.
> From a HW point of view I agree that we can setup the PCI host bridge such that
> it uses 64-bit PCI address, with 32-bit cpu addresses. Though in practice doesn't
> this mean that the dma ops used by card drivers has to be provided by our PCI
> host bridge driver so we can apply the translation to those PCI addresses?
> This comes back to my point below about how to do this. Adding a bus notifier
> to do this may be too late, and arm64 doesn't implement set_dma_ops().
> 
> > And no, you should not limit at the card driver the DMA_BIT_MASK() unless the
> > card is not capable of supporting more than 32-bit addresses.
> If there was infrastructure that checked all parents dma-ranges when the
> dma_set_mask() function is called as Arnd pointed out, this would nicely solve
> the problem.

of_dma_configure calls of_dma_get_range to do all this for the PCIe host,
and then calls arch_setup_dma_ops() so the architecture specific code can
enforce the limits in dma_set_mask and pick an appropriate set of dma
operations. The missing part is in the implementation of arch_setup_dma_ops,
which currently happily ignores the base and limit.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-04 15:00 +0100
  Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM "Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - 2015-11-04 15:30 +0100
    RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-04 15:50 +0100
      Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM "Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - 2015-11-04 16:10 +0100
        RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-04 16:20 +0100
          Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-04 16:40 +0100
            RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-04 19:10 +0100
        RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-09 13:40 +0100
          Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM "Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - 2015-11-11 19:30 +0100
            Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-11 21:30 +0100
            RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-12 10:30 +0100
              Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-12 11:00 +0100
                RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-12 16:40 +0100
                Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-12 17:20 +0100
                RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-13 14:10 +0100
                Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-13 15:10 +0100
                RE: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com> - 2015-11-13 15:20 +0100
              Re: PCIe host controller behind IOMMU on ARM "Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - 2015-11-12 11:40 +0100

csiph-web