Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1267694
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks |
| Date | 2015-11-12 09:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtUXv-62X-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qsZFT-1HI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsZFU-1HI-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote: > Using __copy_user_nocache() as inspiration create a memory copy > routine for use by kernel code with annotations to allow for > recovery from machine checks. > > Notes: > 1) Unlike the original we make no attempt to copy all the bytes > up to the faulting address. The original achieves that by > re-executing the failing part as a byte-by-byte copy, > which will take another page fault. We don't want to have > a second machine check! > 2) Likewise the return value for the original indicates exactly > how many bytes were not copied. Instead we provide the physical > address of the fault (thanks to help from do_machine_check() > +extern phys_addr_t mcsafe_memcpy(void *dst, const void __user *src, > + unsigned size); So what's the longer term purpose, where will mcsafe_memcpy() be used? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-09 19:50 +0100
[PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-09 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-11-10 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-10 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-11-11 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-11-12 05:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-12 21:00 +0100
[PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-09 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-11-12 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-12 21:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-11-10 12:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-10 23:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-11-11 21:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-11 22:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-11-11 23:30 +0100
RE: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-11 23:40 +0100
csiph-web