Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1267330
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() |
| Date | 2015-11-11 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtH4e-5Cm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qtzq2-t6-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>remap_file_pages(2) emulation can reach file which represents removed
>IPC ID as long as a memory segment is mapped. It breaks expectations
>of IPC subsystem.
>
>Test case (rewritten to be more human readable, originally autogenerated
>by syzkaller[1]):
>
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <sys/ipc.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <sys/shm.h>
>
> #define PAGE_SIZE 4096
>
> int main()
> {
> int id;
> void *p;
>
> id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 3 * PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> p = shmat(id, NULL, 0);
> shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> remap_file_pages(p, 3 * PAGE_SIZE, 0, 7, 0);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
>The patch changes shm_mmap() and code around shm_lock() to propagate
>locking error back to caller of shm_mmap().
>
>[1] http://github.com/google/syzkaller
So this is a very similar approach that I posted back when this discussion
arose: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/12/959 -- There are a few differences
for which I prefer mine :)
o My shm_check_vma_validity() also deals with IPC_RMID as we do the
ipc_valid_object() check.
o We have a new WARN where necessary, instead of having one now is shm_open.
o My no-ops explicitly pair.
[...]
> ret = sfd->file->f_op->mmap(sfd->file, vma);
>- if (ret != 0)
>+ if (ret) {
>+ shm_close(vma);
> return ret;
>+ }
Hmm what's this shm_close() about?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-11 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2015-11-11 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-11-11 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2015-11-13 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-11-13 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2015-11-13 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2015-11-13 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ipc/shm: handle removed segments gracefully in shm_mmap() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-11-16 10:40 +0100
csiph-web