Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1266173

Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling.

From Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling.
Date 2015-11-10 03:00 +0100
Message-ID <qt6o2-6Uw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qsMfE-1po-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsMfE-1po-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qt0LE-2nj-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 02:53:57PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> @@ -1858,74 +1849,75 @@ static void mod_sysfs_teardown(struct module *mod)
>>  /*
>>   * LKM RO/NX protection: protect module's text/ro-data
>>   * from modification and any data from execution.
>> + *
>> + * General layout of module is:
>> + *          [text] [read-only-data] [writable data]
>> + * text_size -----^                ^               ^
>> + * ro_size ------------------------|               |
>> + * size -------------------------------------------|
>> + *
>> + * These values are always page-aligned (as is base)
>>   */
>> -void set_page_attributes(void *start, void *end, int (*set)(unsigned long start, int num_pages))
>> +static void frob_text(const struct module_layout *layout,
>> +		      int (*set_memory)(unsigned long start, int num_pages))
>>  {
>> -	unsigned long begin_pfn = PFN_DOWN((unsigned long)start);
>> -	unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_DOWN((unsigned long)end);
>> -
>> -	if (end_pfn > begin_pfn)
>> -		set(begin_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, end_pfn - begin_pfn);
>> +	BUG_ON((unsigned long)layout->base & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
>> +	BUG_ON((unsigned long)layout->text_size & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
>> +	set_memory((unsigned long)layout->base,
>> +		   layout->text_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> Should the set_memory() call be skipped if text_size is 0?

Not AFAICT.  And in practice:
1) Every module on my system has a .text section.
2) Every module has a rodata section (.modinfo)
3) Every module on my system has a .data section.

So I think it would be a premature optimization.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling. Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2015-11-09 05:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling. Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2015-11-09 21:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling. Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2015-11-10 03:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling. Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2015-11-10 05:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling. Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2015-11-12 02:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling. Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2015-11-12 04:50 +0100

csiph-web