Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1265889
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning |
| Date | 2015-11-09 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qsYA9-123-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qprhn-3F0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrQOl-68f-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrTsS-7CR-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrVXI-V4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsXXt-xH-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:51:20AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 03:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:54:06PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>>>+static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
> >>>>+ struct pv_node *pp = (struct pv_node *)prev;
> >>>> int waitcnt = 0;
> >>>> int loop;
> >>>>+ bool wait_early;
> >>>>
> >>>> /* waitcnt processing will be compiled out if !QUEUED_LOCK_STAT */
> >>>> for (;; waitcnt++) {
> >>>>- for (loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) {
> >>>>+ for (wait_early = false, loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) {
> >>>> if (READ_ONCE(node->locked))
> >>>> return;
> >>>>+ if (pv_wait_early(pp, loop)) {
> >>>>+ wait_early = true;
> >>>>+ break;
> >>>>+ }
> >>>> cpu_relax();
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>So if prev points to another node, it will never see vcpu_running. Was
> >>>that fully intended?
> >>I had added code in pv_wait_head_or_lock to set the state appropriately for
> >>the queue head vCPU.
> >Yes, but that's the head, for nodes we'll always have halted or hashed.
>
> The node state was initialized to be vcpu_running. In pv_wait_node(), it
> will be changed to vcpu_halted before sleeping and back to vcpu_running
> after that. So it is not true that it is either halted or hashed.
Durh,.. I mixed up pv_wait_node() and pv_wait_head() I think. Sorry for
the noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-06 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-11-06 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-06 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-11-09 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-09 18:40 +0100
csiph-web