Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1265782
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue |
| Date | 2015-11-09 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qsXb4-dY-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qsDYK-4kU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote: > I have a few ideas on how to overcome this, and would like your > feedback on the matter: > > 1) One possible approach would be to reserve an extra status flag > in struct thread_info to get the TS_COMPAT status at syscall > entry. It would _not_ be updated when the executable is loaded, > so the state at return from execve would match the state when > entering execve. This is a simple approach, but requires kernel > changes. Or add a flag TS_EXECVE that can be set by the tracepoint syscall enter, and checked on exit. If set, we know that the exec happened. > > 2) Keep the compat state at system call entry in a data structure > (e.g. hash table) indexed by thread number within each tracer. > This could work around this issue within each tracer. This is of course what you can do now. As it doesn't touch the kernel. > > 3) Change the syscall number in the struct pt_regs whenever we > change the compat mode of a process. A 64-bit execve system > call number would be mapped to a 32-bit compat execve number, > or the opposite. This requires a kernel change, and seems to be > rather intrusive. > This is a definite no. I'm thinking the TS_EXECVE flag would be the least intrusive. Add a comment that it is used by tracepoints to map between compat and non-compat syscalls when execve switches the flag. This would not need to touch any of the logic of the hotpaths within the systemcalls themselves. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2015-11-08 20:40 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-09 17:10 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-11-09 20:30 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-09 20:50 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-09 22:00 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-09 22:20 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2015-11-10 02:40 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-10 03:00 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-10 03:40 +0100
Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-12 02:10 +0100
csiph-web