Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1265699
| From | Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer |
| Date | 2015-11-09 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qsViW-7qm-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qrJ0u-Z9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrJ0u-Z9-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Nov 6, 2015, at 3:44 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Hi Akashi,
> Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame
> to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries
> (return_to_handler) showing up in a stack tracer's output.
>
> This patch replaces such entries with originals values preserved in
> current->ret_stack[].
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index c5534fa..3c60f37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
>
> extern unsigned long ftrace_graph_call;
>
> +extern void return_to_handler(void);
> +
> static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
> {
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index ccb6078..5fd3477 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> */
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/stacktrace.h>
>
> @@ -73,6 +74,9 @@ struct stack_trace_data {
> struct stack_trace *trace;
> unsigned int no_sched_functions;
> unsigned int skip;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> + unsigned int ret_stack_index;
> +#endif
> };
>
> static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
> @@ -81,6 +85,20 @@ static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
> struct stack_trace *trace = data->trace;
> unsigned long addr = frame->pc;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> + if (addr == (unsigned long)return_to_handler - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) {
not if (adds == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)?
> + /*
> + * This is a case where function graph tracer has
> + * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame
> + * to hook a function return.
> + * So replace it to an original value.
> + */
> + frame->pc = addr =
> + current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret
> + - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
Ditto. not without AARCH64_INSN_SIZE?
I've observed many return_to_handler without the changes.
Am I missing something?
> + }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
> +
> if (data->no_sched_functions && in_sched_functions(addr))
> return 0;
> if (data->skip) {
> @@ -100,6 +118,9 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
>
> data.trace = trace;
> data.skip = trace->skip;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> + data.ret_stack_index = current->curr_ret_stack;
Can I get an idea on why current->curr_ret_stack is used instead of
tsk->curr_ret_stack?
Best Regards
Jungseok Lee--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: ftrace: fix incorrect output from stack tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 07:50 +0100
[PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: ftrace: add arch-specific stack tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: ftrace: add arch-specific stack tracer Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: ftrace: add arch-specific stack tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-11 06:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: ftrace: add arch-specific stack tracer Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 00:00 +0100
[PATCH v5 4/6] arm64: insn: add instruction decoders for ldp/stp and add/sub AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] arm64: insn: add instruction decoders for ldp/stp and add/sub Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] arm64: insn: add instruction decoders for ldp/stp and add/sub AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-11 06:00 +0100
[PATCH v5 1/6] arm64: ftrace: modify a stack frame in a safe way AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 07:50 +0100
[PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-10 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-16 10:30 +0100
[PATCH v5 3/6] ftrace: allow arch-specific stack tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] ftrace: allow arch-specific stack tracer Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-06 14:40 +0100
[PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: ftrace: add a test of function prologue analyzer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: ftrace: fix incorrect output from stack tracer Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: ftrace: fix incorrect output from stack tracer AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-10 04:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: ftrace: fix incorrect output from stack tracer Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 14:40 +0100
csiph-web